|
New Delhi, 22nd
February, 2001
The
Planning Commission has been estimating the incidence of poverty at national
and state level using the methodology contained in the report of the Expert
Group on Estimation of Proportion and Number of Poor (Lakdawala Committee)
and applying it to consumption expenditure data from the large sample
surveys on consumer expenditure, conducted periodically by the National
Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO). Poverty estimates for the years 1973-74,
1977-78, 1983, 1987-88 and 1993-94 made on this basis were released by
the Government of India, Press Information Bureau on 11th March,
1997.
The
NSSO has now released the key results of the latest large sample survey
data on consumer expenditure (55th Round), covering the period
July, 1999 to June, 2000 (see Report No.454 (55/1.0/2). Two sets of different
distributions of consumer expenditure from the 55th Round have
been reported because of experimenting with the method of data collection.
In the earlier large scale surveys, the NSSO estimated monthly per capita
consumption expenditure on the basis of responses using a 30-day recall
period though data were collected for some of the non-food items using
reference periods of both 30 days and 365 days from the same household.
In the 55th round, consumption expenditure on clothing, footwear,
medical (institutional) and durable goods were collected by using a 365-day
recall period. In the case of all other non-food items, the 30-day recall
period was used as earlier. The data regarding consumption of food items
were collected by using two different reference periods of last 30 days
and last 7 days from the same household in that order. The two sets of
data so collected were tabulated and the corresponding distributions of
persons by monthly per capita consumption expenditure were included in
the report, though the data based on 7 days reference period for the food
items were collected only for investigating the suitability of the shorter
reference period.
Since
both consumer expenditure distributions have been published, the Planning
Commission has estimated poverty from both distributions reported by the
NSSO, using the accepted methodology. State specific poverty lines have
been estimated using the original state specific poverty lines identified
by the Lakdawala Committee and updating them to 1999-2000 prices using
the Consumer Price Index for Agricultural Labourers (CPIAL) for rural
households and the Consumer Price Index of Industrial Workers (CPIIW)
for urban households. These poverty lines are given in Table 1. The poverty
lines have then been used in conjunction with each of the two consumption
distributions, to estimate the percentage of people below the poverty
line (poverty ratio) for each state. As in the past, separate estimates
have been made for rural and urban areas for each state, which are then
combined into a state level estimate.
The
consumer expenditure data of the 55th Round on a 30-day recall
basis yields a poverty ratio for 1999-2000 of 27.09% in rural areas, 23.62%
in urban areas and 26.10% for the country as a whole in 1999-2000 (Table
2). The corresponding figures from the 7-day recall period are 24.02%
in rural areas, 21.59% in urban areas and 23.33% for the country as a
whole. (Table 3)
Although
the 7-day estimates used in Table 3 are being reported in the interest
of transparency, it should be noted that the NSS Governing Council has
not yet decided to switch from the 30-day basis for food items to the
7-day basis. For the present, the 30-day estimates reported in Table 2
are being used as the appropriate estimate of poverty.
The
change in the methodology regarding the measurement of durable consumer
goods from a 30-day recall period in earlier large sample surveys to a
365-day recall period in the 55th Round implies that the 30-day
estimate for 1999-2000 in Table-2 may not be fully comparable with the
earlier estimate. This fact needs to be kept in mind in assessing trends
over time. However, improvement in methodology of collecting data is a
continuing exercise.
Table
1: State-Specific Poverty Lines in 1999-2000
(Rs. per capita per month)
| No. |
State |
Rural |
Urban |
| 1 |
Andhra
Pradesh |
262.94 |
457.40 |
| 2 |
Assam |
365.43 |
343.99 |
| 3 |
Bihar |
333.07 |
379.78 |
| 4 |
Gujarat |
318.94 |
474.41 |
| 5 |
Haryana |
362.81 |
420.20 |
| 6 |
Himachal
Pradesh |
367.45 |
420.20 |
| 7 |
Karnataka |
309.59 |
511.44 |
| 8 |
Kerala |
374.79 |
477.06 |
| 9 |
Madhya
Pradesh |
311.34 |
481.65 |
| 10 |
Maharashtra |
318.63 |
539.71 |
| 11 |
Orissa |
323.92 |
473.12 |
| 12 |
Punjab |
362.68 |
388.15 |
| 13 |
Rajasthan |
344.03 |
465.92 |
| 14 |
Tamil
Nadu |
307.64 |
475.60 |
| 15 |
Uttar
Pradesh |
336.88 |
416.29 |
| 16 |
West
Bengal |
350.17 |
409.22 |
| 17 |
Delhi |
362.68 |
505.45 |
|
All
India# |
327.56 |
454.11 |
- The poverty line(implicit)
at all-India level is worked out from the expenditure class-wise distribution
of persons and thepoverty ratio at all-India level. The poverty ratio
at all-India level isobtained as the weighted average of the state-wise
poverty ratio.
Table 2: Number and Percentage
of Population Below Poverty Line by States - 1999-2000
(30-day Recall period)
|
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Combined
|
|
1.
|
Andhra
Pradesh |
58.13 |
11.05 |
60.88 |
26.63 |
119.01 |
15.77 |
|
2.
|
Arunachal
Pradesh |
3.80 |
40.04 |
0.18 |
7.47 |
3.98 |
33.47 |
|
3.
|
Assam |
92.17 |
40.04 |
2.38 |
7.47 |
94.55 |
36.09 |
|
4.
|
Bihar |
376.51 |
44.30 |
49.13 |
32.91 |
425.64 |
42.60 |
|
5.
|
Goa |
0.11 |
1.35 |
0.59 |
7.52 |
0.70 |
4.40 |
|
6.
|
Gujarat |
39.80 |
13.17 |
28.09 |
15.59 |
67.89 |
14.07 |
|
7.
|
Haryana |
11.94 |
8.27 |
5.39 |
9.99 |
17.34 |
8.74 |
|
8.
|
Himachal
Pradesh |
4.84 |
7.94 |
0.29 |
4.63 |
5.12 |
7.63 |
|
9.
|
Jammu
& Kashmir |
2.97 |
3.97 |
0.49 |
1.98 |
3.46 |
3.48 |
|
10.
|
Karnataka |
59.91 |
17.38 |
44.49 |
25.25 |
104.40 |
20.04 |
|
11.
|
Kerala |
20.97 |
9.38 |
20.07 |
20.27 |
41.04 |
12.72 |
|
12.
|
Madhya
Pradesh |
217.32 |
37.06 |
81.22 |
38.44 |
298.54 |
37.43 |
|
13.
|
Maharashtra |
125.12 |
23.72 |
102.87 |
26.81 |
227.99 |
25.02 |
|
14.
|
Manipur |
6.53 |
40.04 |
0.66 |
7.47 |
7.19 |
28.54 |
|
15.
|
Meghalaya |
7.89 |
40.04 |
0.34 |
7.47 |
8.23 |
33.87 |
|
16.
|
Mizoram |
1.40 |
40.04 |
0.45 |
7.47 |
1.85 |
19.47 |
|
17.
|
Nagaland |
5.21 |
40.04 |
0.28 |
7.47 |
5.49 |
32.67 |
|
18.
|
Orissa |
143.69 |
48.01 |
25.40 |
42.83 |
169.09 |
47.15 |
|
19.
|
Punjab |
10.20 |
6.35 |
4.29 |
5.75 |
14.49 |
6.16 |
|
20.
|
Rajasthan |
55.06 |
13.74 |
26.78 |
19.85 |
81.83 |
15.28 |
|
21.
|
Sikkim |
2.00 |
40.04 |
0.04 |
7.47 |
2.05 |
36.55 |
|
22.
|
Tamil
Nadu |
80.51 |
20.55 |
49.97 |
22.11 |
130.48 |
21.12 |
|
23.
|
Tripura |
12.53 |
40.04 |
0.49 |
7.47 |
13.02 |
34.44 |
|
24.
|
Uttar
Pradesh |
412.01 |
31.22 |
117.88 |
30.89 |
529.89 |
31.15 |
|
25.
|
West
Bengal |
180.11 |
31.85 |
33.38 |
14.86 |
213.49 |
27.02 |
|
26.
|
A
& N Island |
0.58 |
20.55 |
0.24 |
22.11 |
0.82 |
20.99 |
|
27.
|
Chandigarh |
0.06 |
5.75 |
0.45 |
5.75 |
0.51 |
5.75 |
|
28.
|
Dadra
& Nagar Haveli |
0.30 |
17.57 |
0.03 |
13.52 |
0.33 |
17.14 |
|
29.
|
Daman
& Diu |
0.01 |
1.35 |
0.05 |
7.52 |
0.06 |
4.44 |
|
30.
|
Delhi |
0.07 |
0.40 |
11.42 |
9.42 |
11.49 |
8.23 |
|
31.
|
Lakshadweep |
0.03 |
9.38 |
0.08 |
20.27 |
0.11 |
15.60 |
|
32.
|
Pondicherry |
0.64 |
20.55 |
1.77 |
22.11 |
2.41 |
21.67 |
|
|
All
India |
1932.43 |
27.09 |
670.07 |
23.62 |
2602.50 |
26.10 |
Notes
- Poverty Ratio
of Assam is used for Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh,Meghalaya,Mizoram,Manipur,Nagaland
and Tripura.
- Poverty Line
of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa is used toestimate
poverty ratio of Goa.
- Poverty Line
of Himachal Pradesh and expenditure distribution of Jammu & Kashmir
is used to estimate poverty ratio of Jammu & Kashmir.
- Poverty Ratio
of Tamil Nadu is used for Pondicherry and A & N Island.
- Urban Poverty
Ratio of Punjab used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh.
- Poverty Line
of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli
is used to estimate poverty ratio of Dadra & Nagar Haveli.
- Poverty Ratio
of Goa is used for Daman & Diu.
- Poverty Ratio
of Kerala is used for Lakshadweep.
- Urban Poverty
Ratio of Rajasthan may be treated as tentative.
Table
3: Number and Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line by States -
1999-2000
(7-day Recall period)
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Combined
|
| 1. |
Andhra
Pradesh |
48.14
|
9.15
|
55.96
|
24.48
|
104.10
|
13.79
|
| 2. |
Arunachal
Pradesh |
3.23
|
34.00
|
0.15
|
6.29
|
3.38
|
28.41
|
| 3. |
Assam |
78.27
|
34.00
|
2.00
|
6.29
|
80.27
|
30.64
|
| 4. |
Bihar |
322.96
|
38.00
|
43.64
|
29.23
|
366.60
|
36.69
|
| 5. |
Goa |
0.23
|
2.80
|
0.40
|
5.03
|
0.62
|
3.90
|
| 6. |
Gujarat |
36.87
|
12.20
|
24.80
|
13.76
|
61.66
|
12.78
|
| 7. |
Haryana |
11.13
|
7.71
|
4.33
|
8.02
|
15.46
|
7.79
|
| 8. |
Himachal
Pradesh |
4.63
|
7.61
|
0.24
|
3.95
|
4.88
|
7.27
|
| 9. |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
3.10
|
4.14
|
0.42
|
1.70
|
3.52
|
3.53
|
| 10. |
Karnataka |
47.02
|
13.64
|
39.35
|
22.33
|
86.36
|
16.58
|
| 11. |
Kerala |
18.20
|
8.14
|
17.73
|
17.91
|
35.93
|
11.14
|
| 12. |
Madhya
Pradesh |
202.78
|
34.58
|
74.93
|
35.46
|
277.70
|
34.81
|
| 13. |
Maharashtra |
109.25
|
20.71
|
96.81
|
25.23
|
206.05
|
22.61
|
| 14. |
Manipur |
5.54
|
34.00
|
0.56
|
6.29
|
6.10
|
24.21
|
| 15. |
Meghalaya |
6.70
|
34.00
|
0.29
|
6.29
|
6.99
|
28.75
|
| 16. |
Mizoram |
1.19
|
34.00
|
0.38
|
6.29
|
1.57
|
16.50
|
| 17. |
Nagaland |
4.42
|
34.00
|
0.24
|
6.29
|
4.66
|
27.73
|
| 18. |
Orissa |
131.63
|
43.98
|
23.92
|
40.33
|
155.55
|
43.38
|
| 19. |
Punjab |
8.53
|
5.31
|
4.03
|
5.40
|
12.56
|
5.34
|
| 20. |
Rajasthan |
48.97
|
12.22
|
25.36
|
18.80
|
74.33
|
13.88
|
| 21. |
Sikkim |
1.70
|
34.00
|
0.04
|
6.29
|
1.74
|
31.03
|
| 22. |
Tamil
Nadu |
73.19
|
18.68
|
45.81
|
20.27
|
119.00
|
19.26
|
| 23. |
Tripura |
10.64
|
34.00
|
0.41
|
6.29
|
11.05
|
29.24
|
| 24. |
Uttar
Pradesh |
379.41
|
28.75
|
110.82
|
29.04
|
490.23
|
28.82
|
| 25. |
West
Bengal |
154.04
|
27.24
|
31.06
|
13.83
|
185.10
|
23.43
|
| 26. |
A
& N Island |
0.52
|
18.68
|
0.22
|
20.27
|
0.75
|
19.13
|
| 27. |
Chandigarh |
0.06
|
5.40
|
0.42
|
5.40
|
0.48
|
5.40
|
| 28. |
Dadra
& Nagar Haveli |
0.26
|
15.31
|
0.02
|
10.89
|
0.28
|
14.84
|
| 29. |
Daman
& Diu |
0.02
|
2.80
|
0.04
|
5.03
|
0.05
|
3.92
|
| 30. |
Delhi |
0.12
|
0.63
|
6.52
|
5.38
|
6.64
|
4.75
|
| 31. |
Lakshadweep |
0.02
|
8.14
|
0.07
|
17.91
|
0.10
|
13.72
|
| 32. |
Pondicherry |
0.58
|
18.68
|
1.62
|
20.27
|
2.20
|
19.83
|
|
All
India |
1713.35
|
24.02
|
612.57
|
21.59
|
2325.92
|
23.33
|
Notes:
- Poverty Ratio
of Assam is used for Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh,Meghalaya,Mizoram,Manipur,Nagaland
and Tripura.
- Poverty Line
of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa is used toestimate
poverty ratio of Goa.
- Poverty Line
of Himachal Pradesh and expenditure distribution of Jammu & Kashmir
is used to estimate poverty ratio of Jammu & Kashmir.
- Poverty Ratio
of Tamil Nadu is used for Pondicherry and A & N Island.
- Urban Poverty
Ratio of Punjab used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh.
- Poverty Line
of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Dadra & Nagar Haveli
is used to estimate poverty ratio of Dadra & Nagar Haveli.
- Poverty Ratio
of Goa is used for Daman & Diu.
- Poverty Ratio
of Kerala is used for Lakshadweep.
- Urban Poverty
Ratio of Rajasthan may be treated as tentative
|